In my recent post “Gaming the System” I suggested sales rep
quota performance (and ethics) is heading in the wrong direction. That puts pressure on front line sales
managers. How is your company
responding?
My company is rolling out sales manager training. When I looked into the possibility of participating
in the skills side I was told our initial content was “very tactical”. Tactical is important for sales managers to
master. However, there is so much more.
How does your company define the front line sales manager
role? One option is to have sales
managers sell – a combination of manager plus individual contributor. Bob Croston of the RAIN Group suggested in
the Nov/Dec 2019 issue of SMM Connect ©:
Sales Managers shouldn’t sell…
·
Too busy to coach/mentor their reps
·
Decreases respect from subordinates
·
Recruiting is dropped
·
Observation and accountability are
compromised
Observation – now there’s a key skill to sales manager success. I mean, how would you know if your reps are
doing the right things, in the right way, on a consistent basis if you don’t
regularly observe?
You can observe a lot by just
watching.
Yogi
Berra
Do your Sales Managers observe? Or, as one of my sales manager mentees asked
me when he was first promoted from rep to manager, “Gary is my job to be the
super-sales-closer or an observer?” My
view is Sales Managers must help each of his or her reps become the
super-sales-closer. That is a more
scalable approach and it helps prevent reps from gaming the system.
That led to his next question, “What if my rep can’t be a
super-sales-closer?” I responded he must
then replace said under-performing rep.
Ahhh yes… “off-boarding”… there’s a skill-oriented managerial process,
true? Do you think your Sales Managers
discharge people fairly and with dignity?
I believe the managers' job is to get the job done through
his/her people – current people or future people – which is up to each sales
rep’s ability to do the job they are hired for.
Easy for me to write about – hard to execute in the real world. It’s not unique to sales management:
By Thursday evening of the 1974
Open, that atmosphere was toxic. After the first round at Winged Foot, there
was not a single player under par. The best one among them, Jack Nicklaus, had
rolled his first putt that day right off the green. With each passing moment,
Tatum, the man largely responsible for the course setup, said, "It felt
like radiation was spreading."
And so came the line, the one
you hear every year at the U.S. Open, and likely will for as long as they play
it.
"We're not trying to
humiliate the best players in the world," the chairman of the USGA's
competition committee declared that day. "We're simply trying to identify
who they are."
Sandy
Tatum
Identifying who to keep (and who to cut) without
humiliation. Or, without avoidance
either. Another negative trend my former
manager mentioned to me recently is:
Management by email
Now there’s a tactical-oriented
sales management approach in today’s
online world. Do you have regular, live
interactions with your manager? Or, does
your manager consider email, Slack, texts, and team web-meetings, good ‘nuff?
I believe the best way for
sales managers to prevent gaming of the system by their reps is live contact,
encouragement, observation, and coaching on a regular basis. Letting their people know “No gaming needed -
we are in this together”.
GAP
When
life gets tough we could get a helmet… or… we could leverage the peace and
share the power of a positive perspective.