Tuesday, August 9, 2022

Missing the point?

We're witnessing powerful trends in the workplace today.  Working from home; the "great resignation"; employee empowerment; a 4-day work week…  Although employees at many technology companies might be feeling less empowered these days - who can miss the headlines about Oracle's layoffs? 

            “EMPOWERMENT”: 

A term meant to give survivors of restructure the illusion they have a role in the company's future.

Unknown Sage 

Then I read in LinkedIn that those laid off employees have received an average of 70 new job offers.  Truthfully, it's hard for me to believe that those 70 new opportunities are equivalent to the jobs they lost.  But that's not the point. 

Emphasis on work-life balance makes me wonder if employees believe their managers are opposed to work-life balance.  I don’t think so, but I turned to a subject matter expert for further insight. 

Wikipedia states, "Clayton Magleby Christensen was an American academic and business consultant who developed the theory of "disruptive innovation", which has been called the most influential business idea of the early 21st century."  Now we're getting somewhere.  Clayton offered: 

In most companies, however, individual managers don't have the luxury of surviving a string of trials and errors in pursuit of the strategy that works.  Rightly or wrongly, individual managers in most organizations believe that they cannot fail:  If they champion a project that fails because the initial marketing plan was wrong, it will constitute a blotch on their track record, blocking their rise through the organization.                        

True enough, but I don’t feel managers avoiding career-threatening mistakes is the point. 

Malcolm Gladwell, bestselling author of  Blink© and The Tipping Point©, thinks remote work is actually hurting society.  As told on the “Diary of a CEO” podcast hosted by Steven Bartlett, Malcolm believes people need to come into the office to regain a “sense of belonging": 

"If we don’t feel like we’re part of something important, what’s the point?” he said. “If it’s just a paycheck, then it’s like what have you reduced your life to?” 

Have you noticed the key, missing element in this discussion?  While employees and employers are playing tug-of-war, there's been a dearth of discussion about the customer.  Another thought leader offered this wisdom:           

The problem was that nobody stayed with the customer to make sure they knew how to use the product… Consequently, they built an eighty-percent market share of unhappy clients. 

                        Rick Page 

I don’t know, and frankly don’t care, whether an employee is working from home; in an office; dressed in a 3-piece suit; or wearing yoga pants.  I believe the main point is how do these work-place trends impact customer satisfaction. 

You tell me…  when you’re interacting with an employee at a company and hear their dog barking or their baby crying in the background, is it distracting to you?  How can it not be distracting to the employee too.  As the customer, do we actually believe a distracted employee delivers better customer service? 

Distractions occur at the office you say?  I agree.  So tell me, do more tenured, more experienced employees do a better or worse job of overcoming distractions at the office?  Again I ask, how can a less tenured employee, who moves from company to company during this period of the "great resignation" provide better customer support than a more experienced employee? 

To me, the point being overlooked is this; lose your customers; lose your job - wherever your job is located and however you’re dressed.           

                                                            GAP 

When life gets tough we could get a helmet… or… we could leverage the peace and share the power of a positive perspective.

2 comments:

  1. Lots of thoughts here - but here goes:
    1. Regarding the Oracle layoffs and all of the job offers, maybe if you are 24 and have all of 2 years of workforce experience this is true. But at age 46 (and older) where the next role is that of a Director level or VP level, I would say no. It is going to take a good chunk of time to find something comparable in salary and responsibility...unfortunately.
    2. I whole-heartedly believe that remote working has radically changed the workforce...in so many ways. BUT, if you are a middle manager that has trust issues, and needs to have your workers in an office from 8-5 - these last few years must have been terrible. But guess what, did your staff make their number? Did you make (or exceed) your number? Chances are you did - which flips the micro-managing mindset upside down. The question is not how many hours per day are your staff in front of you, but how many hours per day do you, or your staff, actually work? Like really meaningful work? I think the office culture slices off 2-3 real hours of work due to the coffee pot conversations and the ping pong and the 'check-ins'. I only go to the office when I know I have a slow day because I can't afford to be distracted.
    3. A simple Google search on the topic of distraction yields all kinds of results. Books, consulting firms, videos (how ironic) - all aimed to distract you to learn how to not be so distracted. Go figure. Truth be told, I wear headphones at work almost full time. 90% of the time, there is nothing coming out of the speakers - but people sure do leave me alone...more. At least they have the courtesy to ask me if I am busy.
    I do not deny that being among co-workers provides good bonding, rapport building, story telling and friendship building. It is not entirely necessary - last time I went to the office, I contracted COVID. So long as I have goals and objectives, and know what my boss is measuring, how I do my job (or where I do my job) shouldn't matter.
    Miss you boo! Catch up soon.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks as always for sharing your many thoughts Tony! Much appreciated. Thx, GAP

    ReplyDelete